
May 1, 2018 ● Guest Contributor
Plus-sized women face shocking discrimination from hiring managers, study shows
Have you ever left a job interview feeling like the interviewer was more focused on your appearance than your responses? Chances are you have — and new research shows that if you’re a woman, that gut feeling is quite rational.
A new study from my company, Fairygodboss, asked 500 hiring professionals to look at images of 15 professional women of varied ages and races who had different hairstyles, body shapes, and attire. Respondents chose three adjectives (out of 11) to describe each woman and selected the women they’d be most likely to hire.
The responses revealed that appearance does play a significant role in how hiring professionals perceive women.
The data
In our survey, we first asked hiring managers to pick the top qualities they look for when assessing job candidates. The most frequently selected qualities were professionalism (chosen by 68.28 percent of respondents), reliability (chosen by 60.69 percent), and leadership material (chosen by 46.21 percent). The top hiring choice was a young, Caucasian brunette. She was described as professional, confident, and friendly. While only one of these qualities overlaps with the three top-rated qualities among respondents, she was still the most likely to be hired. If a candidate’s appearance varied from this woman, she was less likely to be hired, regardless of whether or not she had the qualities hiring managers were looking for. Hiring managers were particularly harsh when judging the heaviest candidate. She was more likely than any other woman to be described as lazy (20 percent of respondents matched her with this adjective). Even though 44.8 percent said she was professional and 32.8 percent said she was reliable, just 15.2 percent said they would hire her over the other candidates. This placed her 14th of 15 for hireability. When shown an image of an older candidate, respondents ranked her sixth (out of 15) for professionalism, third for leadership ability, and first for reliability — yet just 29.2 percent said they would hire her over other candidates. Women of color also seemed to be facing a strong bias. Respondents rated most of the women of color as more reliable and having more leadership ability than the Caucasian woman, but remarkably enough, they were all less likely to be hired. This is how the data breaks down: The Caucasian brunette was rated:- Professional - 75.4 percent of respondents
- Reliable - 19.6 percent of respondents
- Leadership material - 27.8 percent of respondents
- Would be hired - 60.0 percent of respondents
- Professional - 64.8 percent of respondents
- Reliable - 29.8 percent of respondents
- Leadership material - 29.2 percent of respondents
- Would be hired - 45.6 percent of respondents
- Professional - 57.6 percent of respondents
- Reliable - 37.0 percent of respondents
- Leadership material - 27.6 percent of respondents
- Would be hired - 31.4 percent of respondents
- Professional - 42.2 percent of respondents
- Reliable - 19.6 percent of respondents
- Leadership material - 33.2 percent of respondents
- Would be hired - 26.6 percent of respondents